|
SWEET-BILLING
PASSES TESTS THAT COMPETITORS FAIL
by Charlie Barry, Technology/Product Manager
“When hearing of a competitive system that did experience
overload, and in effect, debilitated its owners (an ambulance
service), Ortivus wanted the assurance, as well as the proof to our
customers, that the same would not be the reality of an Ortivus
software system.”
As organizations grow and become more reliant on efficient
operations to maintain their business goals and objectives, anything
that hinders the efficiency can become serious very quickly.
Although no one especially likes to admit that computers “rule our
world,” the reality is that if they do not operate as we expect them
to, we become incapacitated very quickly.
To complicate the matter, there is often the “unknown” aspect of
computer systems: “What happens to our software if the operating
system changes?” or “Can the software be broken with an overload of
data or in receipt of unrecognized data?” These questions may not
seem important in the daily routine of business operations…until the
system goes down.
Ortivus is dedicated to taking every measure possible in
preventative assurance that our software supports and advances your
business success, rather than detract from it. When hearing of a
competitive system that did experience overload, and in effect,
debilitated its owners (an ambulance service), Ortivus wanted the
assurance, as well as the proof to our customers, that the same
would not be the reality of an Ortivus software system. Thus, the
rest of the story…
In
August 2006, Ortivus employed the services of an independent partner
in the
CRIM Software Test Center of Montreal, Quebec, Canada to define
and execute a performance test strategy that was equivalent to
entering 1,000,000 calls per year on a 5,000,000 call database. This
equated to running a test consisting of 2,059 transactions (# of
Calls, Collections, and Payment records) with 120 users for a 1 hour
time span.
|
Virtual Users |
Transaction |
|
70 |
Call Entry |
|
22 |
Collection
Entry |
|
23 |
Payment
Entry |
|
1 |
Daily
Reports (Credit) |
|
1 |
Daily
Reports (Call & Patient Collections) |
|
1 |
Daily
Billing |
|
1 |
Monthly
Reporting |
|
1 |
SQL Server
Backup |
|
Total: 120 |
|
After over 250 test sessions were
executed, the conclusion of the test reports that with adequate
hardware, network components, and proper configuration of the system
Sweet-Billing met this challenge successfully.
What is the take-away here for ambulance billing customers? The
apparent take-away is probably – “Make sure your billing system can
handle large loads, especially if you are a large operation
inputting a lot of data.” However, there is a secondary, and perhaps
even more important message also at hand; that of, “What questions
are you asking when researching a software purchase?” Let’s help
each other out with this question and carry it further. Reply to
cheri.lane@ortivusna.com
with your list of questions that your service asks, and we’ll
compile a master list. This list may just become a saving grace
for your operations someday. After compiling a master list, we’ll
publish it in the next issue of OrtivusTALK…but for anyone who
contributes their suggestions to this list, we’ll send you a sneak
peak of those results much sooner!
Let the suggestions roll! And thank you in advance for
participating!
|